Share

News Close-up of a gavel resting on a dictionary with the word "arbitration" highlighted.

The brief supports the Plaintiff-Respondent in their dispute with Bridge City Apartments, LLC, over arbitration fees. The brief argues that because Bridge City Apartments didn’t pay the required arbitration fees, they broke the agreement, meaning the Plantiff-Respondent doesn’t have to continue with arbitration. The brief points out that courts usually don’t force arbitration when one party fails to pay fees, and lists many similar cases. The brief asks the Court to support the Circuit Court’s decision. It argues that it would be unfair and not in line with the agreement or the law to make the plaintiff-respondent go through another arbitration.

Learn More
Event Recap: Reflections on our first CLE
Medical Credit Cards and the Risk They Pose to Consumers